06
JUN
2015

Parrhesia-II. In-depth: «Non in proverbiis sed palam». La parrhesia di Cristo nel commento al Vangelo di Giovanni di Tommaso d’Aquino (Andrea Colli)

Abstract There is no one consistent translation of the term parrhesia in the Vulgata. This would seem to create an insurmountable obstacle to the reception of the concept, not so much in the Paleochristian world – still close to Hellenistic influences – but rather in the studia and th
Continue Reading →
06
JUN
2015

Parrhesia-II. In-depth: «Non più servitori muti di dèi muti». La parrhesia in Hans Urs von Balthasar e Karl Rahner (Milena Mariani)

Abstract The theme of parrhesia clearly emerges in a few dense pages, dating back to the 1950s, by two of the greatest theologians of the 20th Century. At first sight Hans Urs von Balthasar and Karl Rahner seem to be restating two different but already traditional interpretations: the
Continue Reading →
25
OCT
2014

Parrhesia-II. In-depth: Dimensioni socio-religiose della parrhesia giudaica nella tradizione linguistica dei testi biblici (Gian Luigi Prato)

Abstract This paper shows that while the Greek parrhesia is above all concerned with the public and political spheres, the one of the Jews integrates and directs both spheres towards a different perspective, in which the religious dimension is strongest. In this new dimension parrhesi
Continue Reading →
06
JUN
2015

Parrhesia-II. In-depth: Il coraggio della verità: Michel Foucault (Sandro Chignola)

Abstract This essay attempts to examine Foucault’s use of the concept of parrhesia and to understand why he makes it so central to his interpretation of classical and late classical thought. Such an interpretation is not in fact random or impolitic, but actually of critical importance
Continue Reading →
25
OCT
2014

Parrhesia-II. In-depth: Il parresiasta punito, ossia Momus di Leon Battista Alberti (Dante Fedele)

Abstract This contribution is a reading of Momus by L.B. Alberti which highlights the “freedom” with which the main character, Momo, interacts with Jove and the ambiguous status of the “truth” of his words. After having shown briefly that Momo is described as a parrhesiasta on a numbe
Continue Reading →
06
JUN
2015

Parrhesia-II. In-depth: Kant y el ¡Sapere aude! (Lorena Cebolla-Sanahuja)

Abstract For Kant the duty to make public, rather than private, use of reason entails the possibility of contributing to the progress of humanity.  It implies an opposition between the use of reason according to the norm and that against the norm, or the ‘illegal’ use of r
Continue Reading →